Under Section 6 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), the registration of a real-estate project can be extended by the State Real Estate Regulatory Authority on application by the promoter due to force majeure events — war, flood, drought, fire, cyclone, earthquake, or any other calamity — generally for a period of up to one year. Some State RERAs additionally permit extensions on grounds beyond classical force majeure (e.g., reasons not attributable to the promoter, court orders, government delays in approvals) and have during the past few years allowed Covid-related project extensions across multiple cycles. Properly executed, a Section 6 extension protects the project from being treated as in default, maintains escrow flow, and preserves the developer's defence in any subsequent Section 18 refund / interest claim by allottees.
Conversely, missing the extension window or filing it incorrectly is one of the most consequential mistakes a developer can make — once the original RERA-declared completion date lapses, allottees gain an automatic Section 18 right to either withdraw with full refund and interest at SBI MCLR + 2% or continue with monthly delay interest until handover. Our RERA Project Extension Services support developers across MahaRERA, Karnataka RERA, UP RERA, HARERA Gurugram, Telangana RERA, Tamil Nadu RERA, Delhi RERA, Gujarat RERA, West Bengal RERA, and others — handling end-to-end extension applications under Section 6 (force majeure / non-attributable reasons), Section 14 plan-change extensions, two-thirds allottee consent extensions, lapsed-registration revival, hardship applications, and post-extension MIS / quarterly compliance refresh. Whether you are filing a one-year force majeure extension, seeking allottee-consent-based extension beyond the statutory limit, or trying to revive a lapsed registration, we bring the legal precision, evidence rigour, and authority-liaison required.
Sec 6
Extension Provision
Up to 1 Year
Force Majeure Extension
2/3rd Allottee
Consent-Based Extension
Pre-Expiry Filing
Critical Timeline
Frameworks & Provisions We Work Under
RERA Act 2016
Sec 5 – Registration Order
Sec 6 – Extension
Sec 7 – Cancellation
Sec 11 – Functions
Sec 14 – Plan Change
Sec 18 – Refund / Interest
Sec 31 – Complaint
Force Majeure Doctrine
MahaRERA Sec 6 Rules
K-RERA Sec 6 Rules
UP RERA Sec 6 Rules
HARERA Sec 6 Rules
Covid Extension Orders
FAQs on RERA Project Extension
When can a RERA project registration be extended?
Under Section 6 of the RERA Act 2016, the State RERA Authority can extend a project registration on application by the promoter due to force majeure events specifically listed — war, flood, drought, fire, cyclone, earthquake, or any other calamity caused by nature that affects the regular development of the project. Extension is generally limited to one year. Several State RERAs additionally allow extensions on grounds beyond classical force majeure under their state-specific rules — including delays not attributable to the promoter, court orders, government delays, and (during the past few years) Covid-related extensions as per state notifications. Extension is discretionary, evidence-based, and granted by formal order.
When should a developer file a Section 6 extension application?
The best practice is to file the Section 6 extension application before the project's existing RERA registration validity expires. Filing pre-expiry: (a) preserves the project's compliant status on the RERA portal, (b) keeps escrow withdrawals flowing, (c) allows the developer to defend any allottee Sec 18 claim with the extension order in hand, and (d) gives the authority full discretion under Sec 6. Post-expiry filings are treated as revival / restoration applications — possible but with reduced authority discretion, higher allottee challenge risk, and possible cumulative interest exposure for the lapsed period.
What evidence is needed for a force-majeure extension?
Strong evidence is critical for a successful Sec 6 application. Typical evidence includes: (a) government / authority notifications declaring the force-majeure event (e.g., flood / cyclone notifications by the District Collector); (b) news reports of the event and its impact in the project's vicinity; (c) photographs / videos of damage at site; (d) court / regulator orders (where applicable); (e) insurance claim filings; (f) contractor / supplier notifications of force-majeure or supply disruption; (g) labour migration / lockdown orders for pandemic cases; (h) revised work schedule with quantified delay days. Each evidence piece should clearly link the event to the project's actual delay.
Is two-thirds allottee consent always required for an extension?
For a pure Section 6 force-majeure extension, two-thirds allottee consent is generally not statutorily required — the basis is force majeure, certified by the authority. However, several State RERAs prefer or require allottee consent in practice — particularly when the extension goes beyond one year, when the force-majeure case is weak, or when the extension is combined with a Section 14 material plan change (which independently requires two-thirds consent). Consent-based extensions are also a strong goodwill move that materially reduces the risk of subsequent Section 31 / Section 18 complaints by allottees.
What happens if the project's registration lapses without extension?
Lapse of registration without extension creates serious exposure: (a) the project is treated as "completion-defaulted" and every allottee gains an immediate Section 18 right to refund + interest at SBI MCLR + 2%, or to continue with monthly delay interest; (b) the project's escrow withdrawal stops, blocking construction cash flow; (c) RERA portal status flips to "expired", visible to existing and prospective buyers and lenders; (d) the State Authority can initiate Section 7 cancellation / de-registration proceedings; (e) Sec 31 allottee complaints multiply quickly. Restoration / revival is possible but is a much harder, slower, and more expensive route than a timely Sec 6 extension.
Can a developer apply for more than one extension?
Section 6 statutorily contemplates up to one year of extension due to force majeure. However, multiple extensions are possible in practice in two scenarios: (a) where each extension is supported by a distinct force-majeure event (e.g., a Covid extension followed by a separate flood-related extension), and (b) where State Rules / authority orders permit further extension through two-thirds allottee consent or non-attributable-delay grounds. Some State RERAs (including MahaRERA, UP RERA, HARERA) have at various points granted multiple cycles of Covid-related extensions through specific orders. The application strategy must clearly distinguish each ground and avoid stacking the same event multiple times.
Does an extension protect the developer from allottee Section 18 claims?
A validly granted extension order is the single strongest defence against allottee Sec 18 refund / interest claims. Once the State RERA Authority grants the extension, the project's revised completion date becomes the operative date — Sec 18 cannot be triggered until that revised date passes. However, the defence is only as strong as: (a) the force-majeure evidence on which the extension was granted; (b) timely allottee disclosure of the extension and revised timeline; and (c) continuing quarterly compliance (Form 1/2/3) post-extension showing that work is genuinely progressing. Weak evidence, late disclosure, or post-extension lapses can lead the Adjudicating Officer to disregard the extension and award refund / interest anyway.
Timely Extension. Allottee Confidence. Sec 18 Risk Defended.
Partner with our RERA extension specialists for end-to-end Sec 6 extension applications, force-majeure evidence packs, two-thirds allottee consent drives, lapsed registration revival, and authority hearing representation for FY 2026–27.
Talk to a RERA Extension Expert