Business Enquiries +91-9819 000 227 / +91-9819 000 511 / +91-9819 000 147 / +91-9765 000 966
A Section 133(6) notice under the Income-tax Act, 1961 is a formal statutory communication through which an Income Tax Authority calls upon any person — whether the assessee, a third party, a bank, a registrar, a broker, a tenant, a buyer, a seller, a contractor, a business associate, or any entity otherwise connected with a transaction — to furnish specified information or documents useful or relevant for the purposes of the Act. Unlike Section 143(2) scrutiny, which is addressed only to the taxpayer whose return is under examination, a Section 133(6) notice is a wide-ranging evidence-gathering tool — it can go to anyone the department believes holds facts material to a case, and it is increasingly the backbone of the Risk Management Strategy, the e-Verification Scheme, 2021, and the pre-notice data-building exercises that precede Section 148A(b) reassessment show-causes and Section 143(2) scrutiny selections. For a recipient, therefore, a Section 133(6) notice is far more than a routine document call — it is often the first visible signal that the department is building a case, and every word of the response gets recorded, analysed, and used.
The statutory power flows from Section 133 read with Section 133(6). Section 133(6) specifically authorises the Assessing Officer, Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), Joint Commissioner, Commissioner (Appeals), Commissioner, Principal Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Chief Commissioner, or any designated Prescribed Income-tax Authority / Director-General / Director under Rule 112D, to require any person — including banking companies, officers of the State / Central Government, insurance companies, mutual funds, co-operative societies, educational institutions, hospitals, and every other entity — to furnish specified information in such form as the authority may specify. The notice can be issued even in situations where no proceeding is pending against the addressee, provided the information is useful for or relevant to any inquiry or proceeding under the Act. Information commonly sought includes — copies of agreements, bank statements, purchase / sale deeds, rental income data, shareholding details, transaction particulars, confirmation of balances, details of third-party transactions, and records under Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) obligations under Section 285BA.
Our Section 133(6) Notice Response Services cover the full response lifecycle — reviewing the notice to identify the authority, the nature of information sought, the underlying relevance, and the deadline; assessing whether the addressee is being asked about their own affairs (recipient as taxpayer) or as a third party (recipient as witness / custodian); building a complete, accurate, and carefully-worded response with supporting documentary evidence; verifying that the information we provide aligns with AIS / 26AS / our own ITR / books where applicable (to prevent creating unintended mismatches for ourselves or the counter-party); responding through the e-filing portal's Compliance / e-Verification module (where applicable) or by email / hard copy as directed; drafting adjournment requests where time is genuinely short; defending against Section 272A(2)(c) penalty (Rs. 500 per day) for failure to comply; managing follow-up queries, cross-verifications, and onward Section 143(2) / 148A(b) / 147 consequences; and — where the notice is jurisdictionally flawed, over-broad, or issued without specifying any connection to a proceeding — advising on limited compliance, privilege claims, and, in extreme cases, writ challenge before the High Court.
Notice addressed to the taxpayer seeking information about their own transactions / income / assets.
Notice calling the recipient to furnish information about another person's transactions with them.
Institutional Section 133(6) — bank statements, DMAT holdings, MF folios, property registrations.
133(6) notices under the e-Verification Scheme, 2021 for AIS / SFT / 26AS mismatch follow-up.
Section 133(6) to gather data on foreign assets / income — Schedule FA validation, Black Money Act build-up.
133(6) as part of Section 148A(a) preliminary enquiry before reassessment — quiet data-building.
AO, JCIT, CIT, PCIT, CCIT, PCCIT, and Prescribed Income-tax Authority under Rule 112D.
Can be issued to any person — taxpayer, third party, bank, corporate, officer, or institution.
Information must be "useful for or relevant to" any proceeding / inquiry under the Act.
Notice can issue even without any proceeding pending against the addressee (prescribed authority).
Deadline stipulated in the notice — typically 7 to 30 days; adjournments generally granted on request.
Rs. 500 per day of failure to furnish information, leviable after Section 274 hearing.
Response is evidence in any downstream Section 148A(b) SCN, Sec 143(2) scrutiny, or Sec 147 order.
Egregiously over-broad / jurisdictionally flawed notices can be challenged by writ petition.
Decoding the notice, identifying the authority, assessing the underlying proceeding and downstream risk.
Assembling accurate information from books / records, with supporting documentary evidence.
Portal / email / hard-copy submission and management of follow-up queries and downstream notices.
Defence for notices seeking information on your own transactions — ITR / AIS / 26AS tie-out.
Response as witness / custodian — accurate, neutral, non-incriminating information supply.
e-Verification Scheme, 2021 response via Compliance module on the e-filing portal with AIS feedback.
Banks / MFs / brokers / corporates — institutional-scale 133(6) responses with standardised data.
Response where foreign assets / ESOPs / RSUs / overseas accounts are queried — Schedule FA defence.
Strategic response where 133(6) appears to be pre-148A enquiry — prevention of reassessment opening.
Defence against Rs. 500/day non-compliance penalty — Sec 273B reasonable-cause pleas.
High Court writ against egregiously over-broad / jurisdictionally flawed 133(6) notices.
AO has sought information on your own bank / property / equity transactions — data tie-out needed.
Notice asks you to confirm transactions with another assessee — neutral reply critical.
Portal Compliance module shows e-Verification Scheme notice — AIS feedback needs careful drafting.
Notice appears to be pre-reassessment enquiry — response may shape 148A(b) outcome.
Foreign bank / brokerage / ESOP / RSU flagged — Schedule FA and BM Act exposure in play.
Bank / MF / broker / corporate receives 133(6) — high-volume data request requiring careful drafting.
Response window is too short for accurate data gathering — adjournment petition needed.
Notice is omnibus / jurisdictionally vague — limited-compliance or writ strategy evaluation.
Decode the notice, check authority / relevance / deadline, and classify own vs third-party.
Pull relevant transaction data from books, bank, DMAT, MF, and counter-party records.
Ensure alignment with filed ITR / AIS / 26AS to prevent creating mismatches for self / counter-party.
Draft a clear reply with annexures and submit through portal / email / hard copy with acknowledgement.
Manage follow-up queries, downstream 148A(b) / 143(2) preparation, and penalty defence if needed.
Partner with our CAs and advocates for end-to-end Section 133(6) Notice Response Services — own and third-party responses, e-Verification, pre-148A strategy, and penalty defence — all under one roof.
Talk to a Tax Expert