GST Audit & Assessment Support is the end-to-end professional defence of a registered taxpayer during every stage of tax scrutiny under the CGST Act, 2017 — from the initial scrutiny of returns under Section 61 (ASMT-10), through departmental audits under Section 65 (ADT-01 / ADT-02), special audits under Section 66, provisional and summary assessments under Sections 60 and 64, best-judgment assessment under Section 62, and demand proceedings under Sections 73 and 74 culminating in DRC-01 / DRC-07. Every one of these proceedings has a defined statutory form, timeline, and consequence — and the quality of the taxpayer's response at each stage directly drives whether the matter closes at that level or escalates into a full-blown demand and appeal.
Modern GST audits are sharply data-driven. Officers now use GSTN analytics, Rule 88C / 88D mismatches, GSTR-1 vs 3B gaps, GSTR-2B vs 3B ITC differences, e-way bill vs invoice deviations, e-invoice vs GSTR-1 mismatches, and cross-GSTIN data of the same PAN to identify areas of concern well before they issue a single notice. For the taxpayer, this means a GST audit is rarely a surprise — it is the culmination of patterns visible in the data for months. Strong, structured audit & assessment support therefore begins long before the first ADT-01 lands — with clean reconciliation, well-maintained working papers, and a strategy that is legally defensible at every stage.
We offer end-to-end GST Audit & Assessment Support — from pre-audit diagnostic reviews, preparation of working papers and reconciliations, responses to ASMT-10 and DRC-01A, representation during departmental audits under Section 65, replies to DRC-01 show cause notices, personal hearings before the adjudicating officer, drafting of DRC-07 and DRC-03 strategy, and seamless transition into first appeal under Section 107 if needed — so every scrutiny, audit, or assessment is handled with clean documentation, strong legal arguments, and a clear plan to protect ITC, minimise demand, and close the matter at the earliest viable stage.
Sec 61-75
Scrutiny to adjudication
Sec 65 / 66
Departmental & special audits
3 Months
Typical Section 65 audit window
Full Defence
Notice to appeal coverage
Laws & Frameworks We Work Under
CGST Act – Sec 61 (Scrutiny)
CGST Act – Sec 62 / 63 / 64
CGST Act – Sec 65 / 66
CGST Act – Sec 73 / 74 / 75
Form ASMT-10 / 11 / 12
Form ADT-01 to ADT-04
Form DRC-01 / 01A / 03 / 07
Rule 88C / 88D (DRC-01B / 01C)
FAQs on GST Audit & Assessment Support
What is the difference between GST scrutiny, audit, and assessment?
Scrutiny under Section 61 is a preliminary review of a taxpayer's returns to identify discrepancies, communicated through Form ASMT-10 with a reply in ASMT-11. Audit under Section 65 is a much deeper, full-scope examination of the taxpayer's records, returns, and books, usually spread across specified financial years, intimated via ADT-01 and concluded with ADT-02. Assessment is the broader adjudication outcome — self-assessment under Section 59, provisional under Section 60, summary under Section 64, or best-judgment under Section 62 / 63 — culminating in a formal order. Scrutiny and audit often feed into assessment proceedings and demand notices under Sections 73 / 74.
How long does a Section 65 GST audit take?
A departmental audit under Section 65 is required to be completed within three months from the date of commencement of the audit, which is reckoned from the date on which the officer gains access to the records requested. If the Commissioner is satisfied that the audit cannot be completed within this period for reasons recorded in writing, an extension of up to six months can be granted. In practice, the effective timeline is driven by the quality of data and reconciliations submitted by the taxpayer — a well-prepared data pack significantly shortens the cycle and reduces downstream demand risk.
What is DRC-01A and why does it matter?
DRC-01A is a pre-show-cause intimation under Rule 142(1A) in which the proper officer communicates the tax, interest, and penalty ascertained as payable before issuing a formal show cause notice. It gives the taxpayer an opportunity to accept and pay the amount through Form DRC-03 — thereby avoiding a formal SCN, full adjudication, and potentially higher penalty under Section 74. In matters with limited disputable exposure, DRC-01A is often the smartest place to close a matter. In matters with real legal positions worth defending, it is also the right place to place your counter-narrative on record formally.
What is the difference between Section 73 and Section 74 proceedings?
Section 73 deals with determination of tax not paid, short-paid, or ITC wrongly availed / utilised, where there is no element of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts — attracting a lower penalty, typically up to 10% of tax or ₹10,000, whichever is higher. Section 74 covers the same issues where fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression is alleged — attracting a penalty up to 100% of tax. The section quoted in the SCN is very important, because it affects not only the quantum of penalty but also the limitation period and the settlement window under Section 73(5) / 73(8) versus Section 74(5) / 74(8).
Can we pay tax during audit to reduce penalty?
Yes. Sections 73 and 74 both encourage voluntary payment of tax and interest before a formal SCN is issued — Section 73(5) allows payment with no penalty before SCN, while Section 74(5) allows payment with 15% penalty before SCN. Even after SCN, Section 73(8) / 74(8) and related subsections provide reduced-penalty windows if the payment is made within prescribed periods. Strategic use of DRC-03 during audit can therefore materially reduce the final liability. We evaluate this on the basis of merits — paying where defensibility is low, and contesting where the law is clearly on the taxpayer's side.
What is the limitation for issuing a demand under Sections 73 and 74?
Under Section 73, the proper officer is required to issue an order within three years from the due date for furnishing the annual return for the financial year to which the tax relates, with the SCN to be issued at least three months before this order deadline. Under Section 74, the order is to be issued within five years from the same reference date, with the SCN to be issued at least six months in advance. Any SCN or order issued beyond these limitation periods is legally vulnerable, and raising limitation as a defence is often an important part of the assessment strategy.
How do we handle multiple notices across years and GSTINs together?
Large taxpayers often receive multiple notices across years, issues, and GSTINs simultaneously — e.g., ASMT-10 on FY 2017-18, ADT-01 on FY 2018-19 and 2019-20, DRC-01A on FY 2020-21, all alongside regular filings. We handle this through a central case-management framework — a master tracker of every open proceeding, a consistent narrative across replies (so positions are not contradicted), a joint working paper set that feeds all replies, and a defined internal calendar for each deadline. This prevents the common failure mode of being procedurally strong in one case but weak in another due to scattered record keeping.
What happens after a DRC-07 demand order?
A DRC-07 demand order crystallises the tax, interest, and penalty payable and is an appealable order under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The taxpayer can either pay the demand through DRC-03 and close the matter, or file a first appeal in Form GST APL-01 before the Appellate Authority within three months (extendable by one month) from the date of service of the order, along with 10% pre-deposit of disputed tax. Recovery of the balance is automatically stayed once a valid appeal with pre-deposit is filed. Our audit and assessment engagements are always run with an eye on how cleanly the record will transition if an appeal becomes necessary.
Handle Every GST Notice & Audit With Confidence
Partner with our specialists for end-to-end GST Audit & Assessment Support — scrutiny, departmental audit, special audit, SCNs, DRC-07, and first appeal — all under one roof.
Talk to an Expert