What is peer review under ICAI?
Peer review is an independent review of a Chartered Accountant firm's assurance engagements and quality control systems by another qualified Peer Reviewer empanelled with the ICAI Peer Review Board. Its objective is to ensure that the firm consistently complies with technical, professional, and ethical standards of the profession.
Which firms are required to undergo peer review?
Firms auditing listed entities, banks, insurance companies, NBFCs, mutual funds, and other public-interest entities are required to hold a valid Peer Review Certificate. Several regulators including SEBI, RBI, and ICAI have made it a precondition for signing audit reports of such entities.
Who can act as a Peer Reviewer?
Only Chartered Accountants empanelled with the ICAI Peer Review Board can act as Peer Reviewers. They must meet eligibility criteria around years of experience, audit signing record, training requirements, and continuing professional education prescribed by the Board.
What is SQC 1 and how is it linked to peer review?
SQC 1 is the Standard on Quality Control issued by ICAI that requires firms to establish a system of quality control for engagements. Peer reviewers evaluate the design and operation of SQC 1 policies covering leadership, ethics, independence, HR, engagement performance, and monitoring.
How long is a Peer Review Certificate valid?
A Peer Review Certificate is generally valid for a fixed period as prescribed by the Peer Review Board, after which the firm has to undergo a fresh review. Firms are expected to apply well before expiry to ensure continuity for regulatory and listed audit assignments.
What are common issues observed in peer reviews?
Frequent observations include inadequate audit documentation, gaps in risk assessment, weak engagement quality control review, missing independence confirmations, insufficient SQC 1 manual, and absence of ongoing monitoring of completed engagements.
How can firms prepare for peer review?
Firms can prepare by implementing SQC 1, standardising audit working papers, maintaining engagement letters and independence declarations, conducting internal file reviews, and addressing observations from prior reviews. A pre-review readiness assessment can identify and fix gaps in advance.